Unified Patent Court – the Benefits
The primary advantage of the Unified Patent Court for Patentees is that it will operate as a single court with jurisdiction over multiple European States. If all 25 Contracting Member States ratify the UPC Agreement then the UPC will have a wide jurisdiction. An infringement action brought at the UPC would under these circumstances cover all EU States except Spain, Poland and Croatia.
The wide jurisdiction of the UPC will mean that a European Patent can be enforced in multiple States via a single infringement action brought at the UPC. That will be less expensive than the current requirement to bring separate infringement actions before the national courts of each State where there is infringing activity. It will also avoid the undesirable outcome of national courts in different European States coming to different conclusions.
As regards the UPC court procedure, the UPC will be designed specifically for patent litigation. The procedural rules of the UPC will enable a number of advantages for a Patentee seeking to enforce a patent:
- Patents granted in English are likely to be litigated in English. This will reduce translation costs, and enable English speaking litigants to understand and participate fully in the litigation.
- The UPC will have the power to order an alleged infringer to disclose to the Patentee relevant material under their control, eg by providing details of the product or process said to infringe the patent. The UPC can also enable a Patentee to secure evidence of infringement via a saise-contrefaçon procedure, whereby court officials can gain access without notice to the business premises of an alleged infringer.
- The Rules of Procedure for the UPC envisage that the first instance decision should be achieved within a timescale of 12 to 15 months, with a similar amount of time for the appeal. The court should therefore provide an effective remedy within a realistic timeframe.
- The UPC will have the power to award costs against a losing party. Thus, if a Patentee successfully establishes infringement of a valid patent before the UPC, he can recover a proportion of his legal costs from the losing party.
Decisions from the UPC are likely to be of high quality. That is because first instance UPC cases will be heard by a panel of three experienced and specialist intellectual property judges. The plan is that at least one of the first instance UPC judges will be a IP specialist judge from the existing national courts. This ought to ensure high quality decisions from the outset. There will be a Court of Appeal which will sit as a panel of five experienced appeal judges.
For more information please contact Martin Jackson